> >> Do you also uncheck the previously optimized images in the next >> optimization run to make sure they stay put, or can Hugin handle it >> just doing minor adjustments to them? I guess "tension" would build >> up in the pano as it grows otherwise? > > No, I keep the previously optimized images as well. Since these > parameters are already close to the minimum, it does not add much > "tension" (although I probably used the optimization based on the > "last known position", or however it is called). >
Probably you used the "optimize positions incrementally starting from anchor", right? Actually before Hugin/panotools can handle linear panorama, would it be a feasible hack to make an: "optimize positions incrementally from anchor" for e, d, r and hFOV instead? anyone with insight in autooptimize, is that heart surgery or piece of cake? I think it would be useful! -- /O --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
