Hello all. On May 23, 2:50 am, DaveN <tahoedave...@yahoo.com> wrote: > I don't know if this has been asked before (hard question to ask in a > search) but why don't people fuse their images before making > panoramas? By that I mean the software for making panoramas (the > hugin clone ptgui and autopano pro) seem to remap all the images to > create differently exposed panoramas and then blend the panoramas. > Wouldn't it be more efficient to exposure fuse the images and then > make the panorama?
I'm very late to this thread, but I'm catching up. I was wondering if I've been doing it entirely wrong "all the time". All the time means that I havent made that many fused panoramas. With my main example of the entrance to the train station in Bern [1] i remember that I just dumped all the 87 images (29 photos for each exposure step) into hugin and stitched a fused image in one single output. It took a long time for Pan-O-Matic to find the control points but in the end I got a quite impressive result. So I'm asking: would I get another result if I'd have generated three panoramas, one for each exposure step and then enfuse them to one final panorama? Greetings from Switzerland Habi [1]: http://www.flickr.com/photos/habi/sets/72157614221776963/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
