i tried an optimal size stitch (i use a resolution of 5000 x 2500 until i have everything working well). the problem is still here, image 11 is not being cropped properly during remapping, resulting in part of my camera mount being included in the final pano. curious why the jpg worked at 5000x2500 but the tif didn't. how do i run nona from the command line to see if it is ignoring the cropping? i am uploading the three raw snapshots along with the tif i created from fusing them together.
my workflow goes like this: 1) take pictures (manual setting for everything on the camera) 2) copy raw images to the computer 3) run a perl script i wrote that exposes each set of 3 bracketed images and fuses them. the script exposes from -3 to +3 ev with a number of exposure 'steps' given via the command line. i.e., if i want 5 steps, the script will expose at -3, -1.5, 0, +1.5, +3 for each of the three images in a bracketed set 4) send the fused tifs from the script output to hugin i have a manfrotto 190xprob tripod (http://www.manfrotto.com/Jahia/ site/manfrotto/cache/off/pid/13145?livid=68|69&idx=71). it has a center column that can be oriented vertically or horizontally and at the same time it can be fully extended (about 2 feet) in either orientation. to take my nadir, i fully extend it horizontally, move the tripod back so the camera is centered where the tripod sits for taking all the other photos. i have just started using this method, for longer exposures (such as inside a room) it works much better than handheld as i was having a lot of trouble holding the camera steady. On Aug 14, 7:53 pm, Gerry Patterson <thedeepvo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 9:43 PM, slaterson > <campbell.christop...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > > > will send it tomorrow morning... this is from an hdr pano, there are > > actually three raws, each of the raws was exposed several times and > > fused. > > > thanks > > Ah, I was wondering how the exposure was so evenly lit. You say each of > the raws was exposed multiple times...If you bracketed with the camera, did > you also apply exposure compensation with UFRaw to get even more range? > > I noticed you also downsize your final result within Hugin. I remember > reading that nona's interpolaters weren't very good at downsizing and it was > better to render to optimal size and then downsize in another application > such as gimp or imagemagick that had better reducing interpolation > routines. Can someone confirm or deny this? > > I am curious about your nadir shot. Do you use some sort of extension to > offset the camera from the tripod? > > Best Regards, > > - Gerry --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
