On Fri 14-Aug-2009 at 21:53 -0500, Gerry Patterson wrote: > >I noticed you also downsize your final result within Hugin. I remember >reading that nona's interpolaters weren't very good at downsizing and it was >better to render to optimal size and then downsize in another application >such as gimp or imagemagick that had better reducing interpolation >routines. Can someone confirm or deny this?
Yes nona isn't so good at downsizing, so you need to stitch at full size and scale in an image editor. In reality the CCD resolution is effectively lower than the pixel resolution, so you can always stitch digital camera photos at 60% or so without losing much. It will vary depending on camera, but I would expect to start seeing aliasing artefacts if you stitch a panorama below around 40% of full size. -- Bruno --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
