Am Dienstag 15 September 2009 schrieb Yuval Levy: ... > will build the same beta3 and report the same version as above: > 2009.2.0.4414 > > thus we can not uniquely identify what was built based on the svn > number. it is just an indication. using svnversion may simplify the > current code, but yield the same result and has the same issue. > > what we need is to identify the path that is build, i.e. differentiate > from > https://hugin.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/hugin/hugin/tags/hugin-2009.2.0_b >eta2/ > > to > https://hugin.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/hugin/hugin/tags/hugin-2009.2.0_b >eta3/
I was on the wrong path. Didn't take into account that the branches (you are
speaking about it, don't you?)
share the same svn-version as trunk.
My "sollution" was meant for trunk only.
So, sorry for the noise.
Kornel
--
Kornel Benko
kornel.be...@berlin.de
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
