Hi Lukáš, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: > What I think may be quite nice way to store necessary data is the XML.
this has been discussed before. The result was that some people favor the Makefile, others would favor the XML (me included). The next logical step, rather than discussing this to death once again, would be to branch out a development codeline and start playing with your ideas (which I support). Add an XML library. Output some mockup XML from it. Show what you mean. Discuss on that basis. I think your analysis is right and that XML has advantages; and if done properly an XML to Makefile is also possible. Another possibility would be YAML. Have you considered it? Regarding parser, aren't there libraries around that we can re-use? Backward-compatibility is a non-issue IMO. The Makefile is always reproducible from the PTO file. Unless I am misunderstanding you completely and your plan is to replace the PTO file with an XML file? if you plan to replace the PTO with XML, we'll need a PTO2XML utility to convert older project to the new format, and maybe keep support for PTO loading during a transitional time. Maybe you want to wait for Layout integration before branching out. Am I assuming correctly that the integration of Deghosting has worked well? Yuv --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
