Aha! Thanks Darko, now I follow you. So this is to preserve image groups (CP connected images)!
So let me run though: 1. I loaded an existing mosaic project to get a starting test, but noticed that the whole group moved. In x and y. *When rolling it rolled around the center (0,0,0) figure, got it now.* 2. I figured this was the grouping so I deleted all CP 3. Without grouping i could individually drag each image in X and Y, and rebuild and actually improve my old project. 4. However, now when rotating one image in the corner, it still rotated around the "old" group/panorama center. Was that intended or should it now revert to rotating the individual image arount it's X,Y? Maybe individual rotation should be a separate function altogether 5. Y and P are not possible in group, but when the images are independent, an individual Y, and P movement is consistent So I realized that I could test this (step 5 and 6 above) straight away, and so I did. So I tested in the same project to manually update picture r, y and p and it does work. Excellent! Then there is another question whether a feature request to do add this via the drag-gui would make sense... ;-) I'm going to play round with this some more, a gui always sparks ideas. Like for example: Maybe it is useful to make an image semi-transparent when overlapping another image while dragging to aid alignment; Maybe it would be good to have a tick to turn off group-mode to be able to nudge one image in place (or like I do to lay out a complete panorama without CPs) Cheers /O 2010/4/26 Darko Makreshanski <dmakreshan...@gmail.com> > Oskar Sander wrote: > >> >> >> So this begs a question though: I've played with Darko's excellent patch >> (some of my projects are actually almost better manually laid out) And my >> statement "*camera angles (y, p ,r) are applied in each camera's position* " >> does not seem right. A rotation by holding down shift, rotates the image >> not around the camera position, but around the "panorama camera" position. >> Also I would expect a y & p movement to be quite un-problematic with my >> statement. >> >> What is not right here? >> > Your statement: "*camera angles (y, p ,r) are applied in each camera's > position*" is right > > What you are experiencing is a feature that I have included in the patch > > When you are rolling in both mosaic and normal mode, apart from the roll > parameter the TrX and TrY parameters are changed as well to preserve > correspondence between images in image groups. > Yaw and pitch should also be automatically adjusted, however I haven't > tested this. > > Basically my idea was that in normal mode you can adjust y,p,r parameters > and preserve correspondence in image groups but you can't adjust TrX, TrY > and TrZ. > > In linear mode though you can adjust TrX, TrY, TrZ and you can adjust roll > parameter as well, but you can't adjust yaw and pitch without loosing > correspondence. > > Best, > Darko > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. > A list of frequently asked questions is available at: > http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ > To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<hugin-ptx%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx > -- /O -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
