Okay, third one in a row. With a bit more guesswork I've managed to stitch a reasonable product. this looks fine without any vignetting correction, which fits well with my initial judgement that the slight background brightness variations should be hardly noticable in the output. I have a suspicion about the source of your brightness variations. I suspect you have not masked out the bright spots that occur in one corner of every plate. These are often white, sometimes orange, sometimes mulicoloured, and it is seemingly arbitrary in which corner they occur. I did a trial stitch where I did not mask them out and the result looked quite like
http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&q=http://porpoisehead.net/images/dss_blend_needed.jpg&usg=AFQjCNEp9PMwvLRVsiuPw76sGDXRLE9AUw When I did mask the bright corners out (manually did that for 100 images around the N pole, where is N001, anyway?) the brightness fluctuations were gone. Please doublecheck if this is maybe the cause of your problem. Keep in mind that a multi-resolution blender (like enblend) will produce the seeming 'bleeding' of bright areas to surrounding areas, so their effect extends beyond the extent of the bright area. with regards Kay -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
