Am Dienstag, 1. März 2011 schrieb Yuval Levy: > On March 1, 2011 04:40:09 am Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 1. März 2011 schrieb kfj: > > > On 28 Jan., 17:45, Kornel Benko <kornel.be...@berlin.de> wrote: > > > > If you upgrade than consider that on 10.10 the cmake is erroneous. > > > > (try somehow to downgrade cmake from 2.8.2 to version 2.8.0.) > > > > > > In what way erroneous? I've been using cmake 2.8.2 on my Kubuntu 10.10 > > > system for months and it has always done precisely what it's supposed > > > to do. > > > > Creating debian package with "make package" ... > > ...is just more broken than in previous and latest version. AFAIK it has > always been "broken" in that the Debian packages build with CMake/CPack > don't pass basic Debian tests / policies. Google for a thread in this > list where Andreas Metzler gives the details.
It is. But still I am using this build-process without problems. (Until now I was using the 2.8.0 version, but since some days I use the 2.8.4 version on ubuntu 10.10) (Got it from "ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/c/cmake/"; cmake_2.8.4-2_amd64.deb cmake-data_2.8.4-2_all.deb cmake-qt-gui_2.8.4-2_amd64.deb ) > Using the combination of > make package && sudo dpkg -i <NAME_OF_THE_GENERATED PACKAGE> > is barely better than using > make && sudo make install Naturally I don't follow you here. Installing through package makes it easy to deinstall also. Ok, maybe it's valid for me only ... ... > Yuv > Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
