On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 09:52:29AM -0200, Carlos Eduardo G. Carvalho (Cartola)
wrote:
> I have already thought of editing seams graphically, I think I would
> appreciate such possibility and I think it would be a little better than
> masks, cause when you do masks there will still be a seam decision after
> that and you can't preview where it's going to be. Sometimes when I do
> masks I have to redo them after blending to adjust an unexpected result.
> Thanks to multiblend it is much faster now :)
I personally think that the seam-selection process should be separate
from the blender.
So... A way to represent the seams has to be found, and multiblend
should be able to use a provided seam. As it works now, multiblend can
continue to do the seam-selection itself it none is provided.
Then.... a commandline interface for the seams may be defined. So
pro-users can define a seam themselves.
For mortals a gui-seam-editor may be provided.
A commandline option on multiblend should allow it to export the seams
it would make. So a gui-seam-editor can ask multiblend for the default
seams, present them to the user and then allow the user to change
them.
Roger.
--
** [email protected] ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2600998 **
** Delftechpark 26 2628 XH Delft, The Netherlands. KVK: 27239233 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
The plan was simple, like my brother-in-law Phil. But unlike
Phil, this plan just might work.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
