I agree (with both Harry and Erik) seam optimization is the really big obvious missing feature in multiblend that would make it a truly amazing tool.
one idea - i see multiblend can blend images that are not overlapping - so maybe the blending part of the tool is already done, and now we need another tool, for "cutting" the source images in the right places. at any rate, wherever the 'cutting' happens, i hope that multiblend evolves into the great tool I think it's destined to be! On Sunday, January 1, 2012 2:31:49 PM UTC+1, Erik Krause wrote: > > Am 31.12.2011 19:54, schrieb Harry van der Wolf: > > > You know it: users always ask for more:) > > That's true! What I would very much like to see in multiblend is a seam > optimization like in smartblend. This would make multiblend a real > killer! Unfortunately the smartblend algorithm isn't known. There are > only some hints, f.e in > http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx/msg/1ff668e2a06a38b1 > > Another idea would be a faster replacement for enfuse... > > -- > Erik Krause > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
