-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Am 09.01.2012 12:26, schrieb Geoff G8DHE:
> Well its never going to be accurate enough to act as a final template,
> that's to be sure! The current sensors will give a ±5° which is sufficient
> to place the image in the rough location, ready for aligning. But if we
> don't start he ball rolling then there will never be demand for cheaper
> more accurate sensors to be provided or used !
I am really wondering if this is worth the effort (regardless whether it
is +- 5% or +- 1%): Won't it be easier to implement that sort of
matching in software based on the image data?
Cheers,
Gerhard
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAk8K05IACgkQfg6TFvELooS2cwCfeMPzUQLOpRL6Axa6bSx+zIra
KgsAnigJvKELjZ+VygSNHaunyCPGBR00
=6vrR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
