JohnPW wrote:


The main thing I notice with this process is that the highest of the highlights 
seems to get slightly blown. But is this a result of the strategy itself or 
just the finer points of it? Perhaps some adjustments might make a difference, 
say the sigmoidal contrast settings — perhaps the contrast factor needs to be 
edged down bait? Or maybe the weighting of the enfuse settings should be 
different from the defaults? Or is it inescapable with this process because of 
a simple principle of image
manipulation theory? Or maybe it's inescapable even with full access to a RAW 
file?

Are they un-blown in ANY of the intermediate images?

 BugBear

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and 
other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx

Reply via email to