Hello JohnPW IMO, you shouldn't compare the highlights between any image and c100: since c100 is the darkest, it will always show more details in the highlights than any other picture. You should always compare with the original. Does o2 do better than à1 in the T shirt? I believe so.
2012/12/18 JohnPW <johnpwatk...@gmail.com> > Hi Bugbear, > > Admittedly initial image is not the greatest. It is a pano stitched from > jpeg originals. But it's pretty good. Here is a small detail from the image: > > c100 the darkest of the faux brackets, which would presumably have the > best exposure of the highest highlights. > o1 the input file > o2 the output file > > The place I see some loss of detail is in the white T shirt. The > difference is most obvious when comparing o1 and o2. It seems to me the > detail is there in c100, but not in o2. The shirt is brighter, but the > texture is blown. This surprises me, because I would have thought that > enfuse would have selected these detail pixels from c100 as "best exposed." > What do you think? > > John > > > > On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 5:01:29 AM UTC-6, bugbear wrote: > >> JohnPW wrote: >> >> > >> > The main thing I notice with this process is that the highest of the >> highlights seems to get slightly blown. But is this a result of the >> strategy itself or just the finer points of it? Perhaps some adjustments >> might make a difference, say the sigmoidal contrast settings � perhaps >> the contrast factor needs to be edged down bait? Or maybe the weighting of >> the enfuse settings should be different from the defaults? Or is it >> inescapable with this process because of a simple principle of image >> > manipulation theory? Or maybe it's inescapable even with full access to >> a RAW file? >> >> Are they un-blown in ANY of the intermediate images? >> >> BugBear >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. > A list of frequently asked questions is available at: > http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ > To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx > -- Frederic Da Vitoria (davitof) Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » - http://www.april.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
