2013/1/15 paul womack <pwom...@papermule.co.uk> > Erik Krause wrote: > >> Am 14.01.2013 16:28, schrieb Robert Campbell: >> >>> I recall it does output Canon's CR2 format >>> >> >> No, it doesn't. The files have the extension .CR2 but it's "CHDK raw" >> that can only be read by very few programs and doesn't contain any metadata. >> > > It's probably worth pointing out that due to the limited nature of > most P&S digital to analogue converter that the RAW files > so generated are not quite as manipulable as the RAW > file from a recent vintage DSLR. > > For the vast majority of purposes, it's better, even on a CHDK equipped > P&S, to stay with JPEG. > > BugBear >
I don't understand your point. I agree that RAW without any metadata is very limited, but DNG seems OK to me. I don't see where JPEG is better than DNG (apart from the file size and writing speed) -- Frederic Da Vitoria (davitof) Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » - http://www.april.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
