Am 15.01.2013 10:21, schrieb paul womack:
It's probably worth pointing out that due to the limited nature of most P&S digital to analogue converter that the RAW files
You most likely mean analog to digital converter.
so generated are not quite as manipulable as the RAW file from a recent vintage DSLR. For the vast majority of purposes, it's better, even on a CHDK equipped P&S, to stay with JPEG.
This might be true, especially since raw takes far longer to process. However, raw is beneficial not only for dynamic range and white balance adjustment (where your concern applies) but also for CA removal, which is far better on raw data than on jpegs.
-- Erik Krause http://www.erik-krause.de -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
