This rotation likely occurred after you optimized, correct?  I've seen it 
recommended here that before you optimize, it's always a good idea to add 
at least one vertical line to one of your images using the control point 
editor.  Personally, my panos don't seem to ever have vertical lines in 
them with which I can do this, but it might work for you.  After you've 
optimized, I'm not sure what you can do, but there's far bigger brains on 
here than mine!

Cheers, and good luck!
Terry B


On Monday, March 2, 2015 at 12:26:54 PM UTC-8, Bob Mahar wrote:
>
> I learn something new every day!   checkpto is my new friend
>
> I rarely use the quick preview or the wizard thing any more which shows 
> this.   Yes, that will certainly mess up things.   I'm sure that is it.  
> I'll try and clean it up tonight and see what happens.  But I'm sure you 
> are correct.   The unattached image is a piece of blue sky.
>
> On another problem child project, I am noticing that the images are being 
> rotated oddly.  The Pentax K-5 I use does indicate orientation, and when 
> pointing straight down ( the first course for a stereographic projection ) 
> the orientation may be stupidly assigned by the camera.   Is there a means 
> to force the images to be displayed the same way in the control point 
> editor?   Or to ignore the EXIF orientation hints?
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Sunday, March 1, 2015 at 10:29:46 PM UTC-5, Tduell wrote:
>>
>> Hello Bob, 
>>
>> On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 13:56:05 +1100, Bob Mahar <muhl...@gmail.com> wrote: 
>>
>> > 
>> > 
>> > On Sunday, March 1, 2015 at 4:47:47 PM UTC-5, Tduell wrote: 
>> >> 
>> >> Hello Bob, 
>> >> 
>> >> I would assume that these are big projects, as I have never run into 
>> >> similar behaviour with small to moderately sized projects. 
>> >> Can you attach the .pto file for the project, saved prior to   
>> >> optimisation 
>> >> 
>> >> for positions and barrel? 
>> >> 
>> > 
>> > Big is relative, its ~40 exposure stacks of 5 shots each.   I've had 
>> > projects with several times more images, and on much less competent 
>> > hardware.   The pto is attached. 
>> > 
>> > Thanks for taking a look! 
>>
>> I'm running a basic optimisation now (positions), which is grinding along 
>>   
>> exceedingly slowly. 
>> In the meantime I have run your .pto through checkpto, the result is   
>> attached. 
>> Note that there are two unconnected image groups, each group shown in [ 
>> ]. 
>> You might want to check that this is correct. I suspect unconnected image 
>>   
>> groups may cause problems, and think I have come across them before, but 
>>   
>> can't for the life of me recall what project or where to be able to 
>> dredge   
>> up any more useful info. 
>> I can't pursue that any further as I don't have the images to eyeball. 
>> Could you check that out and let's know how you get on? 
>>
>> Cheers, 
>> -- 
>> Regards, 
>> Terry Duell
>
>

-- 
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/3e21813f-fd9e-40ce-b4c0-ed18a859e598%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to