FWIW, I downloaded the original TIFF images. Did CPFind, Find Vertical
Lines (it found none). Optimize Positions (incremental, starting from
anchor), Clean control points, Optimize Everything without translation.
Optimize for Low Dynamic Range. Set it to rectilinear projection, full
size. The stitch came out just fine.
That's a very peaceful looking neighborhood.
I did learn a bit: I feel reassured that my present laptop (2.4GHz
4-core/8-thread i7 with 16GB RAM) could handle it, since I'm hoping
sometime to replace my present 6MP DSLR with a 24 or 36MP one. I've been
eying the new AMD and Intel processors, wondering if I'd need to jump to
one of those. I have a couple of strip panoramas what cover many miles
of coastlines (some in Hawaii, some in Canada), so nice to know I'll
still be able to process such panoramas with higher resolution images. :)
On 10/17/2017 10:44 AM, 'dkloi' via hugin and other free panoramic
software wrote:
<https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-gaEFRn2ccmY/WeZqip7wWlI/AAAAAAAEVZg/J4XdStdsM5kImh6imX4Co07UF8SbjUnxgCLcBGAs/s1600/test.jpg>
Here's a downscaled version of the 24202 pixel wide stitch. Hugin
2017.0.0.eac5e8cc546e on Windows 10 Ent 64 bit. Don't see any problems.
CPFind, added some VCPs, position optimization, remove outliers,
position optimized again, photometric optimisation, stitch at maximum
optimum size.
On Tuesday, 17 October 2017 17:32:59 UTC+1, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote:
Here is a the link to original files. It is possible to reproduce
exporting.
https://yadi.sk/d/um_AyDWy3NqRLZ
<https://yadi.sk/d/um_AyDWy3NqRLZ>https://yadi.sk/d/um_AyDWy3NqRLZ
<https://yadi.sk/d/um_AyDWy3NqRLZ> https://yadi.sk/d/um_AyDWy3NqRLZ
<https://yadi.sk/d/um_AyDWy3NqRLZ>
https://yadi.sk/d/um_AyDWy3NqRLZ <https://yadi.sk/d/um_AyDWy3NqRLZ>
вторник, 17 октября 2017 г., 19:06:12 UTC+3 пользователь T. Modes
написал:
Strange,
Am Dienstag, 17. Oktober 2017 17:25:58 UTC+2 schrieb Alexander
Rabtchevich:
Hello
Here is a scaled down picture, produced with hugin
2017.1.0.64cc39ce23d4 . The result doesn't depend on the
type of blending software - internal one or enblend-mp and
enfuse-mp are used. The scenario was - loading pictures,
CPFound + Celeste, geometrical optimization (positions),
fotometric optimization (LDR), adding several vertical lines
and automatic straightening.
I recall it is the second time I see the similar output. The
previous was more than a year ago.
If needed, I can provide with original tiffs.
I can't see anything strange in the pto file. And with dummy
images I can't reproduce the issue.
Can you test if the remapped images are okay and the issue is
with the blender or if the remapped images are already buggy (on
the stitcher tab select remapped images)
One more idea: Have your images icc profiles embedded? If so
check the icc profile for the red image.
--
David W. Jones
gnomeno...@gmail.com
wandering the landscape of god
http://dancingtreefrog.com
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/0a4f8ff7-a5d6-3b6c-1ddc-0d9adf0f3468%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
