Thanks for your reply. Yeah I've readed just in the moment, that it is deprecated.
Exsample from Enblend: http://enblend.sourceforge.net/gigapixel.htm Here the machine just have 2GB RAM and it works for a bigger solution. Or is this a different version of enblend? Am Donnerstag, 2. November 2017 20:39:24 UTC+1 schrieb Sean Greenslade: > > On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 12:20:51PM -0700, jojaeger...@gmail.com > <javascript:> wrote: > > Hi Gunter, > > I also see, that the RAM could be to less. > > But for this thing, it would be perfect, when i could activate > image-cache > > option. > > > > Best Regards, > > Johannes > > The image-cache feature was deprecated in 4.1 and removed in 4.2. But I > believe it was just a cache on the input images, so it wouldn't have > really helped in your scenario. > > I think you have two options. One, add more RAM / switch to a machine > with more RAM. Or two, stitch smaller portions of the pano separately > and then merge them. You could try stitching a cubemap (6x rectilinear > cube faces) instead of a full equirect pano. > > --Sean > > -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/4f0cc932-8c0c-4022-a87b-685408423ce9%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
