Which version of enblend was that? I have enblend 4.2 on this laptop and
have never used either of those settings.
On 11/05/2017 12:01 AM, jojaeger12031...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah this really looks like modern art :D
The size was calculated by hugin.
I have player around with the options:
For me the best setting is:
--pre-assemble --primary-seam-generator=nearest-feature-transform
No black holes & full size panorama
Am Samstag, 4. November 2017 06:12:01 UTC+1 schrieb GnomeNomad:
Wow, that's a major abstract/psychedlic blowup in middle of the 2nd
(larger) image.
I have no idea where it might come from. Anyone else?
Just out of curiousity ... was that 36336 pixel width set by Hugin
(using the Stitcher tab's "Calculate Optimal Width" button), or a width
you specified?
On 11/02/2017 09:39 PM, jojaeger...@gmail.com wrote:
> This night hugin success the build process with no error.
>
> One with a width of 20000
> One with a width of 36336
>
> But here you can see yourself, something went wrong:
> www.dropbox.com/s/bjswqcl2s4nurg2/20k_36k.png?dl=0
--
David W. Jones
gnomeno...@gmail.com
wandering the landscape of god
http://dancingtreefrog.com
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/3aca95fa-ed30-95ba-8531-dd03680b19fa%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
