Hi Kay,
Never played with the Registry before - steep learning curve. My current 
installer (and INNO script) can be downloaded from:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/rp5py97hxh1j8gx/Lux%20setup.iss?dl=0
If associated, Lux can be selected  by right clicking an appropriate file  
--open with-> choose another app. I have not worked out yet how to add it 
to the basic open with list during installation.  
As the installer changes the registry I suggest that you create a restore 
point before you start.

As the program files are changing, I think that you should have the 
installer and distribute. I think that it is obvious what needs to change 
in the script to use access the main program files. Also I think that 
'ini'  is not a good file extension to use as so many other programs use it 
for various purposes
Brian
PS Don't have privileges to contact you off line
On Friday, May 28, 2021 at 5:01:25 PM UTC+10 kfj wrote:

> Am 28.05.21 um 03:55 schrieb smib:
>
> > Sorted out icons.
>
> Good.
>
> > What mimes (other than pto files) did you have in mind?
>
> I'd let the installer offer to make lux the standard viewer for common 
> image files (.jpg, .tif, .png) and also for .exr files. Here on my 
> systems I have it as standard program to open PTO files as well - I tend 
> to look at the PTOs more often than edit them with hugin - and also for 
> the .ini extension, which is a bit debatable, but lux accepts ini files 
> as image input, e.g. for cubemaps or to 'wrap' .exr files with metadata. 
> But that would also offer other ini files used by the system to be 
> opened by lux. I may have to change the extension, or add a shebang, 
> what do you think?
>
> All of this should be optional, and the user should have to explicitly 
> make the choice for any of the mime options. I don't know if you can 
> also make mime associations which only show up in the context menu 
> ('open with') without changing the default application - if so, I'd 
> offer lux in the context menu for all the mime types given above.
>
> BTW - can you offer different types of install? Like, 'regular' install 
> to the system's binary folder vs. user-only install without admin 
> privileges? That would be nice to have as well.
>
> Looking forward to your installer! Lux 1.0.9 will come out soon, I only 
> did a few bug fixes since 1.0.8e, and when we're both ready your 
> installer can be distributed via bitbucket downloads - unless you want 
> to distribute it yourself.
>
> Kay
>

-- 
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/efc3cc65-4205-4d20-8013-1f4fbd6875f3n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to