> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:hum-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Trev
> Sent: Thursday, 19 February 2009 11:15 p.m.
> To: Hum Sufferers
> Subject: Re: From 1979
>
>
>
> @Geoff: The Hum is not recordable, measurable, or identifiable to any
> external acoustic source.
>
> I know...and that is why it's the Hum- how to lose sight indeed?
So why mix in all those identified hums and physics into the equation at all
?
> How on earth can you justify that these are 'mostly' anything Geoff-
> as you are not everyone else, are you?
I am able to read what those who post here and elsewhere report.
> There may be millions of REAL Hum hearers just NOT reporting it- due
> to being told [ or assuming] it's 'only' something else!
Absolutely, and a proportion of those not getting frantic because they know
and understand what it is.
> Until a whole lot of money and scientific interest is injected into
> the 'field of search' -we are just going to have to stumble around a
> fair bit more.
No. It is well-known and understood.
> But Hey! stick with the open mind and who knows?
Some minds are so open their brains fall out.
geoff
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum
Sufferers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
