Vic -see your other thread for my latest. Bear in mind that there's probably more than one Hum, so you're bound to get different slants from different people, areas and sources Just like we've ended up on two threads :) Sounds like you have a good take on this 40 MHz contender.
On Nov 27, 8:09 pm, Vic <[email protected]> wrote: > Will - Thanks for the explanation. > > As I have written in the column above, I have spectrum analyses from > over a 124 miles of electricity transmission line in PA. I have > spectrum analyses from all over PA, same deal. I have spectrum > analyses from Massachusetts, the same deal. All the same readings, all > the same emissions. I have letters from people all over the States and > Canada - Wherever this crap is installed. All complain of the same > health problems. > > have automated electricity distribution plant for years. > > I recognize that what is needed is that a LOT of "Hearers" get > together and make their case known. That was what I suggested at the > beginning of this column. That does not look like it's going to happen > here. > > On Nov 27, 11:56 am, Will Godson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Sorry Vic, I'm only trying to help. I was in the same place as you six > > months ago; extremely angry that there was no way to get any action on > > the matter, at the ineptitude of investigators and the condecending > > arrogance of doctors. I too believed it was an effect caused by > > wireless digital transmissions. I am still not happy about the amount > > of EMF we are subjected to and since I ditched wireless network, > > mobile and cordless phone I feel a little healthier. But I am afraid > > the EMF theories do not stack up. The hum exists in the remotest of > > places, no gas, electricity or comms. > > > After some reflection on all the possible 'theories' that I had read > > about it became apparent that there was a concerted cover-up > > surrounding the hum. The most well developed of these was microwave > > hearing and it's origin lies with the military and the government. The > > tin-foil hat was another invention of theirs after the Bristol Hum > > became news. These stories are there to misdirect and ridicule the > > people who complain about the hum. The medical profession have > > obviously had there own misdirection from above also. The other method > > they use is attempting to localise the incidents by linking them to a > > particular town, then insisting measurements be taken. > > > Even if you could measure it or record it you would not be able to > > reproduce it for others to hear. That is why measurement is irrelevant > > in this instance. It is peoples experience that matters. Subjective > > evidence IS relevant especially when it relates to peoples well-being. > > The whole science of psychology was founded on this. So you see the > > only way to get action on this matter is to get every possible hum > > sufferer around the world to cooperate and petiton their respective > > governments en-masse. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en.
