I, too was very taken with John's work on this new sensor. The fact that 
air flow is an important factor is interesting.
On the old hoary question of why an audio acoustic component can never be 
measured with hum present this would also apply to the issue of MEM as that 
seems to need an acoustic input mechanism. 
If this line of thought is followed, and one believes in such a mechanism, 
it leads to the idea that there must be gain in the loop to get interaction 
to extremely low trigger levels from hum at the inner ear position.Quite 
likely that muscle spasm would do this but how long term and without any 
other indication as Lidia gets?
I like Lidias ideas but this lack of energy source that can be measured 
does need bringing into the equation, in my view.
John's pickup could well assist in this!

On Monday, 7 July 2014 11:59:05 UTC+1, Lidia wrote:
>
> Dear John,
>
> You have made a real breakthrough with reaching your postulate!: 
>
> *The energy responsible for producing the Hum can only act upon matter 
> which is itself in a state of vibration.*
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum 
Sufferers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to