Le 28/10/2015 18:04, Fabian Wein a écrit :
> I hope I'm still on the right list for my current problem.

Hello
It looks like this should go to us...@open-mpi.org now.

> ---------------------
> A request was made to bind a process, but at least one node does NOT
> support binding processes to cpus.
>
>   Node:  leo
> This usually is due to not having libnumactl and libnumactl-devel
> installed on the node.
> ---------------------
>
> I cannot find these packages for ubuntu 14.04.
>
> I find a lot of ubuntu deb packages on
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/numactl
> But there I only find libnuma but no libnumactl.
>
> Where do I get the libnumactl and libnumactl-devel from?

On Deb-based (Debian, Ubuntu etc), the right package name is
"libnuma-dev". The OMPI message only cares about RPM distros.

> Is this the wrong thread and the wrong list?

Yeah, OpenMPI specific issues should go to OpenMPI list (hwloc is a
subproject of the OpenMPI consortium, but the software projects are
pretty much independent).

Brice


> I have a feeling that I'm quite close but just cannot reach it :(
>
> Thanks,
>
> Fabian
>
>
> On 10/27/2015 04:05 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
>> I guess the next step would be to look at how these tasks are placed on
>> the machine. There are 8 NUMA nodes on the machine. Maybe 9 is where it
>> starts placing a second task per NUMA node?
>> For OMPI, --report-bindings may help. I am not sure about MPICH.
>>
>> Brice
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 27/10/2015 15:52, Fabian Wein a écrit :
>>> On 10/27/2015 03:42 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
>>>> I guess the problem is that your OMPI uses an old hwloc internally.
>>>> That
>>>> one may be too old to understand recent XML exports.
>>>> Try replacing "Package" with "Socket" everywhere in the XML file.
>>>
>>> Thanks! That was it.
>>>
>>> I now get almost perfectly reproducible results.
>>>
>>> np  speedup
>>> 1 1.0
>>> 2 1.99
>>> 3 2.98
>>> 4 3.98
>>> 5 4.89
>>> 6 5.9
>>> 7 6.89
>>> 8 7.87
>>> 9 5.44
>>> 10 6.04
>>> 11 6.55
>>> 12 7.0
>>> 13 7.75
>>> 14 8.24
>>> 15 8.41
>>> 16 9.4
>>> 17 7.33
>>> 18 7.16
>>> 19 8.05
>>> 20 8.39
>>>
>>> What still puzzles me is the almost perfect speedup up to eight and
>>> than the
>>> drop down. But for the beginning 8 is already good!
>>>
>>> Thanks again,
>>>
>>> Fabian
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> hwloc-users mailing list
>>> hwloc-us...@open-mpi.org
>>> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-users
>>> Link to this post:
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/hwloc-users/2015/10/1210.php
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> hwloc-users mailing list
>> hwloc-us...@open-mpi.org
>> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-users
>> Link to this post:
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/hwloc-users/2015/10/1210.php
>>
> _______________________________________________
> hwloc-users mailing list
> hwloc-us...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-users
> Link to this post:
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/hwloc-users/2015/10/1212.php

Reply via email to