A follow up question, can the call to hwloc_get_non_io_ancestor_obj() return a 
numa object? 

> On Mar 14, 2018, at 3:09 PM, Madhu, Kavitha Tiptur <kma...@anl.gov> wrote:
> 
> Hi
> This function was used to query depth of hardware objects of a certain type 
> to bind processes to objects at the depth or above in Hydra previously. As 
> you pointed out, the functionality makes no sense with NUMA/IO objects 
> possibly being at different depths or for objects.
> 
>> On Mar 14, 2018, at 3:00 PM, Brice Goglin <brice.gog...@inria.fr> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello
>> 
>> I can fix the documentation to say that the function always suceeds and
>> returns the virtual depth for NUMA/IO/Misc.
>> 
>> I don't understand your third sentence. If by "actual depth", you mean
>> the depth of a (normal) parent where NUMA are attached (for instance the
>> depth of Package if NUMAs are attached to Packages), see
>> hwloc_get_memory_parents_depth(). However, you may have NUMA/IO/Misc
>> attached to parents at different depths, so it doesn't make much sense
>> in the general case.
>> 
>> What do you use this function for? I thought of removing it from 2.0
>> because it's hard to define a "usual" order for object types (for
>> instance L3 can be above or below NUMA for different modern platforms).
>> 
>> Brice
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Le 14/03/2018 à 20:24, Madhu, Kavitha Tiptur a écrit :
>>> Hello folks,
>>> 
>>> The function hwloc_get_type_or_above_depth() is supposed to return the 
>>> depth of objects of type “type" or above. It internally calls 
>>> hwloc_get_type_depth which returns virtual depths to NUMA, IO and misc 
>>> objects. In order to retrieve the actual depth of these objects, one needs 
>>> to call hwloc_get_obj_depth() with virtual depth. Can the documentation be 
>>> updated to cover this? Or are there plans of changing this behavior?
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> Kavitha
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> hwloc-users mailing list
>>> hwloc-users@lists.open-mpi.org
>>> https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/hwloc-users
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> hwloc-users mailing list
>> hwloc-users@lists.open-mpi.org
>> https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/hwloc-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> hwloc-users mailing list
> hwloc-users@lists.open-mpi.org
> https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/hwloc-users

_______________________________________________
hwloc-users mailing list
hwloc-users@lists.open-mpi.org
https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/hwloc-users

Reply via email to