I'd also like to add that you should have an option of making patterns in 8
beats, or say 32 beats, instead of the 16 only.
Sorry for making this another e-mail
Dustin
----- Original Message -----
From: Tage Widsell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2000 5:48 AM
Subject: Re: Rm2x?
> Word!
>
> I say ditch the built in synth and focus on MIDI and sequencing. It's
better to
> choose the gear you really want to use. Ok, having it all in one box may
be
> convinient, but how good is it really? There is so much to do in the live
> sequencing field. If you want all in one, get Reason on a laptop ;-)
(don't bash
> me, i'm not plugging our stuff here).
>
> 2 outs would be wonderful, but that would create an interface problem.
having 16
> tracks with 16 mute buttons was the feature that made me buy the RM1x and
i'd
> hate to see more complexity added if that would mean increased flipping
through
> diaplys, switching panel modes etc. 32 mute buttons? Lovely!
>
> /Tage
>
> ----------
> >From: "Olaf Molenveld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Re: Rm2x?
> >Date: tor 18 maj 2000 12.29
> >
>
> > am i the only person that doesn't want an all-in-one approach?? such
beasts
> > always seem to loose points on dedicated devices.....i rather would see
an
> > expanded RM1x in the midi and sequencing approach, and additional buy an
> > SU200/SU300....
> >
> > the most important things for a much better RM1x are: 2 midi outs, no
> > stopping when switching between recording and playing, hearing the other
> > tracks play when in grid-recording, and of course better knobs and
> > switches...i don't care that much about internal sounds (although a
sampling
> > option like the SU200 would be nice ofcourse..aarghhh.there i go again
;)
> > because that's why i have other dedicated synths and a sampler...
> >
> > maybe some kind of chord-sequencing would be very nice though...cause i
> > ain't that good with playing chords..
> >
> > Olaf
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Jay Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2000 11:22 PM
> > Subject: Re: Rm2x?
> >
> >
> >> At 10:31 PM 05/14/2000 -0500, you wrote:
> >> > >Someone said: I can tell you with absolute certainty that there are
NO
> >> > plans for
> >> > >a RM2X in
> >> > >the near future...
> >> >Bullshit man, Yamaha is a huge corporation! You think they're going to
> > pass
> >> >up on a successor to their succesful blue box? No way! DJX2, A3k, 4k,
> > 5k,
> >> >CS1x, 2x, etc...the RM2x is coming.
> >> >Dustin
> >>
> >>
> >> I can tell you with 100% certainty that there is a Yamaha engineer
working
> >> on the next generation of 'remix sequencers'.
> >>
> >> Whether or not it will be called an RM2X, or what features it will
have,
> > is
> >> a total unknown, and is up to Yamaha to announce when appropriate.
> >>
> >> (I can give you this hint, though, based on rumours I have heard:
> >> RM1X+SU300+PLG. *Rumours*, remember.)
> >>
> >> Also, whether or not this product actually *makes* it on the market is
a
> >> different story. A lot of cool projects are developed at Yamaha R&D,
and
> >> not all of them make it out on the market...
> >>
> >> (I cite the famed AN1R - rack mount AN1X - as an example. This was
done,
> >> ready for production, but got canned in favour of continued PLG
> >> development... which is another story in and of itself...)
> >>
> >> j.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jay Vaughan | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> TekLab | http://www.teklab.com
> >> {UsePGP:[YES] ICQ:[454804] IRC:[EFNet:#teklab/Torpor]}
> >> [NetMeeting:Yes] [VideoConferencing:Yes]
> >> TekLab SpyCam : http://lab1.teklab.com/~jay/spycam.html
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
