On Tue, 14 Jul 2009, [email protected] wrote:
> you mean an correction, if song older 0.9.4 && sample-samplerate != 
> audio-output-samplerate, in realtime into sampler. imo that's not the 
> best way. it's better to do that if the sample will load into memory. so 
> we don't lost rt time. its nearly the same effect. but without expanding 
> the resample function.

Nah, it's a one time parameter correction.  When the file gets saved 
again, it'll get saved with 0.9.4 in the header and the new "pitch" value 
for that instrument.  It assumes that the user is using his "usual" setup.

> the second thing i notice is, if i play with the pitch values using a 
> sine wav, that the resample fuction produce distortion if the sample is 
> longer. the distortion grows as longer the samle will play. my example 
> samples are 4 secons long. this is long enough to produce horrible 
> distortion.

Yuck!  Yes, there are plenty of opportunities for improvement in the audio 
back-end.  :-)

-gabriel


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge  
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, 
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize  
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
_______________________________________________
Hydrogen-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hydrogen-devel

Reply via email to