Hi Roman,
You are right since those YANG data model drafts need to be read.
However, as long as I know, because an Informational RFC does not have
Normative References usually,
I think they can be cited as Informative References.

Linda,
Could you share your opinion with us?

Thanks.

Best Regards,
Paul

2020년 7월 24일 (금) 오전 6:05, Roman Danyliw <[email protected]>님이 작성:

> Hi Paul!
>
> I'm not so sure we can do that.  By my read, the intent of this document
> is to show how I2NSF can be used (i.e., it's an applicability statement).
> Using the shorthand from [1], the core I2NSF YANG drafts "must be read to
> understand the technology".  If that's the case, then they have to be
> normative.   Does that make sense?
>
> Regards,
> Roman
>
> [1]
> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/normative-informative-references/
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: I2nsf <[email protected]> On Behalf Of RFC Editor
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2020 6:40 PM
> > To: Roman Danyliw <[email protected]>; Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
> > <[email protected]>
> > Cc: [email protected]; skku-iotlab-members <skku-iotlab-
> > [email protected]>; RFC Editor <[email protected]>
> > Subject: [I2nsf] [Roman] Re: Request for Resolving <draft-ietf-i2nsf-
> > applicability>
> >
> > Hi Roman,
> >
> > We're hoping you can provide some input here.  Moving references into or
> out
> > of the Normative section requires AD approval.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Sandy
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 08:40:50AM +0900, Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong wrote:
> > > Hi RFC Editor,
> > > If we move those references to Informative References because our
> > > I2NSF Applicability Draft will be an Informational RFC.
> > > Could you publish our I2NSF Applicability Draft?
> > >
> > > I CC the Security Area AD, Roman Danyliw for his opinion.
> > >
> > > Roman,
> > > Could you say your opinion on this reference issue?
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Paul
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 3:52 AM RFC Editor <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Greetings,
> > > >
> > > > We will update the document as requested, but please note that the
> > > > changes described below do not remove the normative reference holds
> > > > on this document.  The following Internet-Drafts are listed as
> > > > normative references; this document cannot move forward in the
> > > > publication process until these documents are also approved for
> > publication:
> > > >
> > > >    draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm
> > > >    draft-ietf-dots-architecture
> > > >    draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm
> > > >    draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model
> > > >    draft-ietf-i2nsf-registration-interface-dm
> > > >
> > > > Note that you do not need to send us an updated XML file as these
> > > > I-Ds are updated.  We will update these entries to refer to the RFC
> > > > numbers as part of our publication process.
> > > >
> > > > Please let us know if you have any questions.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you,
> > > > RFC Editor/sg
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 12:10:40PM +0900, Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
> wrote:
> > > > > Hi RFC Editor,
> > > > >
> > > > > Our draft is in the state of MISSREF with the five drafts.
> > > > > (https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C405 <
> > > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C405>)
> > > > >
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > --------
> > > > >  draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm   NOT-RECEIVED
> > > > >  draft-ietf-dots-architecture   RFC-EDITOR
> > > > >  draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm   NOT-RECEIVED
> > > > >  draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model   NOT-RECEIVED
> > > > >  draft-ietf-i2nsf-registration-interface-dm   NOT-RECEIVED
> > > > >
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > --------
> > > > >
> > > > > Except for draft-ietf-dots-architecture, other drafts will take
> > > > > more time until they are approved as RFCs by IESG.
> > > > >
> > > > > Could you use the latest versions of the I2NSF-relevant drafts for
> > > > > the
> > > > publication of our draft?
> > > > >
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > --------
> > > > > [consumer-facing-inf-dm]
> > > > >     Jeong, J., Chung, C., Ahn, T., Kumar, R., and S. Hares,
> > > > >     "I2NSF Consumer-Facing Interface YANG Data Model", draft-
> > > > >     ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm-09 (work in
> > > > >     progress), July 2020.
> > > > >
> > > > > [nsf-facing-inf-dm]
> > > > >     Kim, J., Jeong, J., Park, J., Hares, S., and Q. Lin,
> > > > >     "I2NSF Network Security Function-Facing Interface YANG
> > > > >     Data Model", draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm-09
> > > > >     (work in progress), May 2020.
> > > > >
> > > > > [nsf-monitoring-dm]
> > > > >     Jeong, J., Chung, C., Hares, S., Xia, L., and H. Birkholz,
> > > > >     "I2NSF NSF Monitoring YANG Data Model", draft-ietf-i2nsf-
> > > > >     nsf-monitoring-data-model-03 (work in progress), May 2020.
> > > > >
> > > > > [registration-inf-dm]
> > > > >     Hyun, S., Jeong, J., Roh, T., Wi, S., and J. Park, "I2NSF
> > > > >     Registration Interface YANG Data Model", draft-ietf-i2nsf-
> > > > >     registration-interface-dm-08 (work in progress), March
> > > > >     2020.
> > > > >
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > --------
> > > > >
> > > > > There are version-ups for the following drafts.
> > > > > Could you use the latest versions of them?
> > > > >
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > --------
> > > > > [dots-architecture]
> > > > >     Mortensen, A., Reddy, T., Andreasen, F., Teague, N., and
> > > > >     R. Compton, "Distributed-Denial-of-Service Open Threat
> > > > >     Signaling (DOTS) Architecture", draft-ietf-dots-
> > > > >     architecture-18 (work in progress), March 2020.
> > > > >
> > > > > [policy-translation]
> > > > >     Jeong, J., Yang, J., Chung, C., and J. Kim, "Security
> > > > >     Policy Translation in Interface to Network Security
> > > > >     Functions", draft-yang-i2nsf-security-policy-
> > > > >     translation-06 (work in progress), May 2020.
> > > > >
> > > > > [tls-esni]
> > > > >     Rescorla, E., Oku, K., Sullivan, N., and C. Wood, "TLS
> > > > >     Encrypted Client Hello", draft-ietf-tls-esni-07 (work in
> > > > >     progress), June 2020.
> > > > >
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > --------
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, I2NSF Terminology Draft[i2nsf-terminology] expired, so I
> > > > > would
> > > > like to
> > > > > replace [i2nsf-terminology] with [RFC8329], and remove
> > > > [i2nsf-terminology] as
> > > > > citations in the text and its reference paragraph from the text.
> > > > >
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > --------
> > > > > [i2nsf-terminology]
> > > > >     Hares, S., Strassner, J., Lopez, D., Xia, L., and H.
> > > > >     Birkholz, "Interface to Network Security Functions (I2NSF)
> > > > >     Terminology", draft-ietf-i2nsf-terminology-08 (work in
> > > > >     progress), July 2019.
> > > > >
> > > > > [RFC8329]  Lopez, D., Lopez, E., Dunbar, L., Strassner, J., and R..
> > > > >     Kumar, "Framework for Interface to Network Security
> > > > >     Functions", RFC 8329, February 2018.
> > > > >
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > --------
> > > > >
> > > > > There is the addition of IANA Considerations Section as follows.
> > > > > Could you include this new section?
> > > > >
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > --------
> > > > > 10. IANA Considerations
> > > > > This document does not require any IANA actions.
> > > > >
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > --------
> > > > >
> > > > > I attach the revised draft's xml and pdf files with the above
> changes.
> > > > >
> > > > > Could you move this draft forward to publish it as an RFC?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > Paul
> > > > > --
> > > > > ===========================
> > > > > Mr. Jaehoon (Paul) Jeong, Ph.D.
> > > > > Associate Professor
> > > > > Department of Computer Science and Engineering Sungkyunkwan
> > > > > University
> > > > > Office: +82-31-299-4957
> > > > > Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>,
> > > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> > > > > Personal Homepage: http://iotlab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php
> > > > > <
> > > > http://cpslab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > ===========================
> > > Mr. Jaehoon (Paul) Jeong, Ph.D.
> > > Associate Professor
> > > Department of Computer Science and Engineering Sungkyunkwan University
> > > Office: +82-31-299-4957
> > > Email: [email protected], [email protected] Personal Homepage:
> > > http://iotlab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php
> > > <http://cpslab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > I2nsf mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
>
_______________________________________________
I2nsf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf

Reply via email to