Hi, Marco Hunsicker wrote: > It's a pity that Gereon did not comment any further. Sorry for that, but I have been on vacation for the last 12 days or so... :-)
Marco Hunsicker wrote: > The alignment is there purely for aesthetic reasons, right? That the > clock displays the seconds in a predictable way? Yes, just as you describe a few mails later: 00 -> 05 -> 10 -> ... Anyhow, I don't have a strong opinion about this. I just consider refreshs that are due to a USR1 "exceptional" and deem the default case to be more important. Ultimately, both problems are only aesthetical: ugly numbers vs. refreshs earlier than <interval> seconds...<http://dict.leo.org/ende/index_de.html#/search=aesthetical&searchLoc=0&resultOrder=basic&multiwordShowSingle=on> Cheers, Gereon
