I don't plan on promoting any templating languages. It offloads the burden to another layer. The dyanmic conditionals would get out of hand. At that point it would be far easier to handle things in java. The heirarchal nature of xml is of great importance to dynamic sql. So, i still see it as being the easiest means to manage the SQL. If you are using a template language you already violate the verasity of your sql outside of ibatis. So, < is a minor issue IMO.
In version 3.0 one of our goals is to remove the dependency on the configuration being solely XML and allow for java based configuraiton. This would mean that the xml would be a way to implement the configuration. XML will continue to be the primary supported means of configuration because there are so many reasons to continue in this direction versus other templating languages. But, in the future if you so desire, it may be possible for you to contribute something cool with velocity. Personally, I don't think velocity would add value to the process. Brandon On 5/23/05, Huy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brandon Goodin wrote: > > This is just plain funny. Can you tell that we love the easy questions? > > > > Brandon > > > > On 5/19/05, Ron Grabowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>You can use: > >> > >> < > >> > > I find it funny that < and > are acceptable solutions (even though > it works). I love sqlmap but I hate xml ! I wish sqlmap used something > like velocity. There was discussion about this a while back anyone have > any further information ? > > Huy > >
