In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 07/28/2005
at 07:13 PM, Ron and Jenny Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I never said that this is silly.
Not only did you say so, you said it again.
> Q. What did I say is silly.
> A. "forcing overflow of PLPA when you have a dedicated volume is
>just plain silly"
>I also said it would be pigheaded.
So how did you not say that it was silly?
>My concern is that you are wrong about what I said is silly (and
>pigheaded).
And yet you confirmed that you said it.
>I monitor and increase it as required.
And that is better than allowing it to overflow how?
>You are trying to say that I have never worked on a real system?
No. You are trying to rebut something that I never wrote instead of
what I did write.
>I didn't expect insults from you.
Why would you expect not to get insults in response to insults? Surely
if you wanted polite discourse then you would stick to the facts and
not use terms like "silly" and "pigheaded".
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
