On 17 Sep 2009 00:12:01 -0700, denisgaeb...@netscape.net (Denis Gäbler) wrote:
>>I don't understand. The scheduling software and the operations >>people look at the return code and respond. But instead of poring >>through a dump, the displays tell them exactly what happened, making >>it easier and quicker to find out what they should do as a result of >>the failure. > Thats the theory. How would you do that at 1000 tx/sec? > >And how would that work with the poor programming that sometimes comes >from the cheaper programmers that are initially hired these days? Any errors that the programmer foresees gets planned for to have a meaningful abnormal end. The ones that were not coded for get the default Abend. And good programmers do better than poor programmers - is that new? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
