My first reaction to Bill's note was to cough <bullsh1t> but then I
stopped and really read it.  I have to agree although I don't want to.
My husband has worked for IBM for 30.5 years now and we wonder every day
if he will have a job next month or next year.  I worked for IBM for
10.5 years but got out two years ago when we saw the writing on the
wall.  IBM is looking to reduce costs by lowering the pay scale, plain
and simple.  We hate that IBM is sending more and more work offshore
when so many people in the USA are out of work.  We really hate that
people we know (many of them highly skilled) have been affected by IBM's
infamous "resource actions" these last two years.  However, as Bill
said, "it's not personal, it's business".

Bill hit the nail on the head.

Joni Lafever-Brown          

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Bill Fairchild
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 10:25 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: IBM driving mainframe systems programmers into the ground

IBM, as a profit-making corporation owned by stockholders and presumably
incorporated somewhere within the USA, has a legally required fiduciary
duty to its stockholders to maximize the value of their stock.  There is
no such required fiduciary duty to sysprogs, the homeless, downtrodden,
political refugees, or any other class of people on earth.  Nor is IBM
required to maintain any allegiance to the USA, support its wars, or
recite the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag at its annual stockholders
meetings.  Any stockholder who feels strongly enough about these other
concerns is free to propose his enlightened ideas to the rest of the
stockholders at their annual meeting.  If enough other stockholders also
want to help the droves of underemployed sysprogs, then they can demand
the appropriate changes from top management.

Freedom and free competition are two-edged swords.  If I want my
employer to have the freedom to sell a software product that induces its
purchasers to eliminate huge numbers of salaried employees and I make my
living from such software, then I ought not complain if other businesses
also have the freedom to compete in such a way that I lose my job,
assuming no coercion or fraud is ever involved (which, of course, makes
my argument irrelevant in the human realm).

I am not happy that IBM will someday do something to end my software
development career prematurely if they possibly can, if that makes them
more profit.  IBM will beat anyone or anything into the ground that its
top management feels is necessary for IBM to continue its highly
profitable existence.  They have done so in the past with large
competitive businesses (NCR, RCA, Amdahl, e.g.), and so now they are
doing it with sysprogs.  To paraphrase the Hyman Roth character from
Godfather part deux:  "It's not personal.  It's business.  This is the
business that we chose."

I still maintain that if IBM makes its mainframes installable and
maintainable by a partially trained chimpanzee, then it will cost a
customer a lot less money to hire one full-time chimpanzee than a human,
thus making the total cost of ownership to the customer lower, thus
allowing more customers to obtain such mainframes from IBM, which can
still make its profit by not lowering their charges to their customers.

No one needs a telephone operator any more to make a local phone call.
Even a chimpanzee can do it.  And now anyone can afford to own his own
phone.

Bill Fairchild

Software Developer 
Rocket Software
275 Grove Street * Newton, MA 02466-2272 * USA
Tel: +1.617.614.4503 * Mobile: +1.508.341.1715
Email: [email protected] 
Web: www.rocketsoftware.com


-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Mike Liberatore
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 6:57 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: IBM driving mainframe systems programmers into the ground

U got to love greed or is it capitialism

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to