Keep your hair on pal. People are only trying to help. David Elliot zSeries Software Support
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of David Shein Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 12:04 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Reentrant Programs and Protected Storage To keep the number of posts down, I'm going to respond to several in one. It has ALWAYS been this way. When you link a program "RENT" you're telling the system that the program does not modify itself. If that's not true, you should not be surprised that things don't necessarily work out. Right! That's the point! The program is NOT linked "RENT" and this is happening anyway. Read the original post more carefully. Is the blocksize of both libraries the same? Yes. 6144. What are the AC, AM, RM of the module in both libraries? 0, 31, and 24. One module is a physical copy of the other, not a re-link. Is the module perhaps written so that it not expecting to be run as NON- authorized? No. It's a very "ordinary" PL/I application program. >My suggestion is debug the problem like any other abend. Get a dump >and analyze it. Find out which instruction is failing, in which >storage (if any) its operands reside, and why the program check occurs... That's essentially what we're doing. However, the failure appears to be happening in IBM code. But only, as mentioned, when loaded from an authorized library. Thanks to everyone for the ideas. We appreciate your time. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
