Wouldn't that be nice... We aren't in a Sysplex, but we do use GRS for shared DASD, so PDSEs are a no go. (We've tried. Too many problems.) Thanks, Frank --
Frank Swarbrick Applications Architect - Mainframe Applications Development FirstBank Data Corporation - Lakewood, CO USA P: 303-235-1403 On 12/1/2009 at 11:27 AM, in message <a90766b5039c59409110c92d47216f59044cc...@s1flokydce2k322.dm0001.info53.com>, "Jousma, David" <david.jou...@53.com> wrote: > Make your DBRM lib PDS-E, and that problem goes away. Linkedit issues a > GRS enqueue SYSIEWLP to serialize the updates. > > _________________________________________________________________ > Dave Jousma > Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Services > david.jou...@53.com > 1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 MD RSCB1G > p 616.653.8429 > f 616.653.8497 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On > Behalf Of Frank Swarbrick > Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 1:26 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: IEC143I 213-30 > > For our conversion from VSE to z/OS we have a "mass compile" process > that runs many compiles at the same time. This has been fine up until > when we added "DB2 compiles" in to the mix. Now we are getting things > like the following for every second or third compile: > 11.02.22 JOB05118 IEC143I > 213-30,IFG0194D,EXAM02,COB,DBRMLIB,9220,DB2001,SYS3.DSN910.DBRMLIB.DATA( > EXAM02) > > "30 > An attempt was made to open a partitioned data set (PDS) for > OUTPUT,DISP=SHR. The PDS is already open in this condition, and a DCB is > already open for output to the data set. The data set might be on the > same system or on another system that is sharing the volume. Access was > not serialized before the attempt to open the data set." > > I am guessing that "job 2" is trying to add a member to > SYS3.DSN910.DBRMLIB.DATA at the same time that "job 1" is trying to do > the same thing (though a different member). > > Obviously one solution is to single thread the compiles. But I'd rather > not if I don't have to. Any other solutions? If I changed to DISP=OLD > would this eliminate the issue by making job 2 wait until job 1 is done > with the PDS? > > Why does the link-edit step seem to not have a similar issue? Is it > just that the link-edit step completes so quickly that only one job has > the PDS open at one time? Or does the link-edit (binder; whatever) have > some special stuff that allows it do deal with this situation? > > Thanks, > > Frank > >>> The information contained in this electronic communication and any document attached hereto or transmitted herewith is confidential and intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any examination, use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy this communication. Thank you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
