On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 13:55:11 -0600, Staller, Allan <allan.stal...@kbm1.com> wrote:
><snip> >Assuming the system was 100% busy, those lower service classes might >not get any service at all. Not just "switch between" one or more >service >classes. ></snip> > >This is true. In my case there is enough for one or the other, but >seldom both (usually about 2/3 of what the batch workloads "want"). > ><snip> >Also when you wrote " A short time later, ..." I assumed you >were talking about something much longer than a 10 second WLM >adjustment interval. Perhaps many minutes. ></snip> > >Initially yes. It *was* sometimes on the order of minutes. As I said the >WLM L2 folks set me straight. >Now it takes, in most cases 2 or 3 adjustment cycles for WLM to react, >not dozens or hundreds as before. > >Still haven't been able to completely eliminate the "alternating >distribution" entirely. > Just out of curiosity, is this a single engine LPAR? Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO mailto:mark.zel...@zurichna.com z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
