On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:10:27 +0100, Hunkeler Peter (KIUP 4) wrote: > >I'm by far anything else than a CICS expert, but I seem to remember >that CICS transaction must not go into a wait, be it deliberately or >as the result of calling a non-CICS service. I think nowadays there >is a special queue to put transactions that do incur waits. > Gee, you do I/O, you wait (or the access method waits) until the DECB gets posted. I suppose CICS might bypass access methods and do STARTIO directly ...
I drifted into "spool" after Jim Thomas's earliest ply yesterday (but the Subject: started "Re:") mentioned "writer", which I took to be JES terminology. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
