Check out the info apars and (very carefully!) check out segmentation
offload. You might want to bounce this off of IBM (either WLM or Comm.
Server ).

That's about all I can recommend. Please post the results when/if there
are any. I would be interested in the responses from IBM.

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Werner Kuehnel
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 8:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Antwort: Re: WLM and TCPIP

Tried already to shift TCPIP into SYSTEM, but is not allowed. WLM can
not 
starve STCs defined in SYSSTC. Why does WLM not cut the processor for
the 
batch jobs which are defined DISCRETIONARY?

Werner Kuehnel


IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu> schrieb am
29.01.2010 
14:49:44:

> Given the situation I would say, probably, NO. You *might* be able to
> move TCPIP to SYSTEM but ISTR some changes made a few releases back to
> force certain system critical tasks into IBM assigned SCLASSes.
> 
> The problem is not the TCPIP is not high enough on the food chain, but
> that the food chain has been shortened when the soft cap kicks in.
This
> is the most likely causes of CPU delay.
> 
> Possible Performance improvements for TCPIP 
> Segmentation Offload. Not sure of the current status. A long history
of
> trys, retrys, and try agains. Check the archives.
> There are a couple of TCPIP performance Inoforamation APARS the also
> might help II11710, II11711, II11712. None of these "address" CPU
> directly, but the net effect will be to reduce the CPU overhead per
byte
> when implemented.
> 
> HTH,
> 
> <snip>
> Our box is running at 90-100% under soft capping. 
> TCPIP is defined with service class SYSSTC. 
> When capping starts the PING response times explode from approx. 15ms
to
> 
> 400 - 1000ms. Looking with RMF3 delay monitor at TCPIP, it shows a
delay
> 
> up to 70% because of processor.
> SYSSTC is the highest service class I can assign, it runs with
> dispatching 
> prio of FE. Nevertheless TCPIP is delayed at such a high degree.
> Is there anything I can do to improve the performance of TCPIP?
> </snip>
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to