>If people don't implement the change properly so as to achieve the intended >goal of the change, it could be worse than useless.
That's my concern: IBM: We've closed a security hole with a new SAF Facility. Customer: Good! What was the hole? IBM: For system integrity reasons, we can't tell you. Customer: How do we configure this to plug the hole? IBM: For system integrity reasons, we can't tell you. Customer: What would happen if we configure it incorrectly? IBM: For system integrity reasons, we can't tell you. Customer: Can you at least tell us what function(s) we should protect? IBM: For system integrity reasons, we can't tell you. Customer: What use is this modification? IBM: For system integrity reasons, we can't tell you. - Too busy driving to stop for gas! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
