On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 15:42:31 -0300, Clark Morris wrote: > >The second is the question of APF authorization. I believe that one >of the longer term goals should be to remove the need for APF >authorization from all utilities where at all possible. The >requirement that IEBCOPY be APF authorized probably should have been >removed 20 - 30 years ago since a competitive product seems to be able >to do without it. Should IDCAMS need to be APF authorized in order to >function. Is IEBCOPY the only reason that SMP/E needs to be APF >authorized? If not, can changes be made to eliminate the need? > No. There's also S99WTDSN.
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
