talking about withdrawn, IBM had done long time ago for ESS 750/800. http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?subtype=ca&infotype=an&appname=iSource&supplier=897&letternum=ENUS906-016
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Schwarz, Barry A <barry.a.schw...@boeing.com > wrote: > Are you aware that IBM has announced that the DS6000 line will be withdrawn > from marketing this summer? > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On > Behalf Of Nigel Salway > Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 9:07 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: ESS 2105-800 DS6800 comparison > > I am looking at migrating from an ESS 2105-800 shark to a used DS6800 > 1750-522. > > I am curious to learn if anyone has done a similar conversion and can > comment on the relative performance of the two storage subsystems. The IBM > redbook SG24-6781-02 says the DS6800 will out-perform the 2105-800 shark in > most zOS implementations. > > I am also interested in hearing from someone who has installed a used > DS6800 and if they had any issues installing and setting up the DS Storage > Manager software. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > -- Cobe Xu Best Regards ----------------------------------------------------------- zOS Performance & Capacity Analyst E2E Performance Analyst Email: cob...@gmail.com ----------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
