On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:57:43 -0400, Don Williams wrote: >Many years ago I worked for a company that had Endevor (before CA purchased >it and changed the name to CA-Endevor). Endevor tracks the relationships >between source, object, & load modules/objects. When a change is made, it >will calculate what needs to be re-compiled, re-linked, etc. and do it. It >does require APF authorization. It invokes compilers, linkers, etc. to >update protected libraries. Conceptually this is similar to SMP. Of course, >that does not mean that CA-Endevor is susceptible to the same exposure. >However, I think that it might be prudent to consider reviewing CA-Endevor >for the possibility. I'm not familiar with Changeman, but I guess that they >are competing products. Does Changeman have features similar to SMP? Should >it be reviewed? Some people may call me Chick Little. > Reviewed by whom? Will IBM make the pertinent information available (presumably under NDA)?
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
