On Thu, 27 May 2010 11:11:39 -0500, Paul Gilmartin <paulgboul...@aim.com> wrote:

>On Thu, 27 May 2010 09:57:50 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
>>>>
>>>And renaming the squatter wouldn't have sufficed?  (Of course one
>>>must anticipate the need to do this.)
>>
>>I don't understand your meaning.
>>
>Backup the obstructing (adjacent) data set.
>
>Rename it.  Now you have you placeholder.  (Data security erase?)
>
>Restore it.
>
>(Same could be accomplished with a copy and two renames.)

Okay, now I understand.  That could work.  In my case the data set
was a catalog though.   If it were a plain 'ol vsam file, yes it could be
renamed, but I wanted the name to be uncataloged (which I suppose if
I changed the HLQ to my own in the rename, it would be almost the same
thing since it wouldn't get re-cataloged in the proper catalog).

So I needed to export the catalog, allocate a place holder, then imported
it so it ended up in a different place.  


>
>I'm just timid; enlarging a VTOC is way outside my job description,
>and I'd be phobic about typos in the ABSTR.
>

Don't worry.  It's not like it forces the data set there.  If the space is
occupied, you will get a JCL error.

Anyway, as this thread has shown, there still are some valid uses for
ABSTR.  

Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS       
mailto:mzel...@flash.net                                          
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html 
Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to