Peter Relson wrote: > But I will point out that we have been making concerted efforts to get > ISVs to share with us their use of "unintended interfaces".
Then Ed Jaffe wrote: > Whether by oversight, laziness, perceived difficulty of implementation, > or whatever, IBM implemented no equivalent programming interface for > PC calls. PC call intercepts, if needed, must always be done at a system > level using "unintended" interfaces. Doesn't sound like IBMs "concerted efforts" are working too well. Knowing Ed, he would have been in there batting hard for this and is obviously pissed off with the response so far. I'm always for more openness - it's up to IBM to provide the interfaces IMHO. Shane ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
