Thanks all. You've provided some clues. It's a difficult problem resolution environment. It's a potential customer's production z box. There are language and time zone and "turf" barriers. It's not possible to just "try this" or "test that."
Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Walt Farrell Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 7:12 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: IEFU83, IEFU84 and IEFU85 Well, I have to admit that I don't feel like looking through all the code right now to see how RACF issues the records in all the different circumstances. But I will point out that although some RACROUTE invocations support only non-cross-memory task mode, others support cross-memory task mode, and some support SRB mode. From that I would expect that we probably utilize most (if not all) of the allowable methods of writing our SMF records in some code path or another. For the failing cases, are you sure that the SMF records are being created at all? Have you seen them in the source system's SMF data sets or SMF log streams? If not, that should be your starting point. If they are there, but your exit is not seeing them, then you know that it's because you need one or more of the other exits. If you are missing specific records, from specific functions, for specific applications that would also provide more diagnostic information. -- Walt Farrell IBM STSM, z/OS Security Design ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
