On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 21:48:06 +0200, R.S. wrote: >W dniu 2010-09-02 19:54, Ted MacNEIL pisze: >>> Would be nice to have(i.e TERM=TS from a batch job) >> >> >> Why? >Isn't it obvious? >More functionality is usually better. If you don't like it, then just >don't use it. > Isn't each of us uncomfortable with anything that he doesn't use but which inevitably dilutes IBM's development and support resource? I don't even like things I don't use but which inevitably bloat the Reference Manual. (cf. Dog in Manger.)
>> Wouldn't that violate so many integrity rules? >Well, it is non-existent feature, so it's quite hard to discuss the >details, but I could imagine a solution which is acceptable. > >> There is always the SEnd command. >Which is not the same, although it can address some needs. > Alternatives: Allocate to DD SYSOUT; track it with SDSF auto-update. Allocate to named pipe; track it with "tail -f". -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
