On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 10:38:51 -0500, Ricc Harding wrote:
>Is there some reason why you don't initialize it to nulls?
>
>SET &X = &STR()
>
>Always set to a known value of nulls...
>
Ignorance. I tried the first thing that occurred to me:
SET &X = &SUBSTR(1:0,junk)
... (why not?) and it failed. I concluded that CLIST is intolerant of nulls.
-- gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
