--- On Sun, 10/17/10, Ted MacNEIL <[email protected]> wrote:

From: Ted MacNEIL <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: S013-64-IEBGENER
To: [email protected]
Date: Sunday, October 17, 2010, 12:13 PM

>"escalate"?  By whom?  Via what channel?  Rarely should tech support inform 
>the reporting programmers' management of perceived unwise programming 
>techniques.

Not necessarity programming techniques, but use of system resources can be more 
expensive than they should be (eg: poor blocking, especially on tape).
That's an interface issue, rather than a programming issue.
And, as a performance/capacity analyst, I have participated in many 
optimisation efforts, with recommendations that have changed programming.

-

Ted:
A LONG time ago and far far away the programming VP asked me to look into ways 
(cheap) of saving CPU time so the nightly batch system would run faster.
I had been peeking around here and there for other reasons so I said why not. I 
developed 5 or 6 programs that I would run daily to see who wasn't blocking 
their data and gross CPU consumption and over abundance of tape drive usage 
(and a few other items that I have long time forgotten).
I would send him a copy of the "PIG" report that became known company wide.I 
did not put names to programmers but they were easily found so while not naming 
people I did attach an USERID .
The VP was absolutely delighted and in his daily staff meeting with the 
supervisors he would hand copies out. The report became so well known I was 
asked by the data center manager to send him a copy as well.
There was no doubt about it programmers were lazy people. I forced an issue 
about not using block contains 1 record and came up with a simple report 
showing those and simply by reblocking (recompile with one statement chamged) 
got us back 3.5 percent cpu time (this was 20-25 jobs) . We were really running 
flat out and desperatly needed a faster system. The small gain allowed us to 
stave off a upgrade for about 6 months. It was a difficult environment and 
difficult to explain on here but the jist of it we (the company)  were paid on 
each trade that was cleared. Traders tended to be cheap so any extra money we 
got was hard fought for. 




----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to