In <listserv%201011070943066366.0...@bama.ua.edu>, on 11/07/2010
   at 09:43 AM, Paul Gilmartin <paulgboul...@aim.com> said:

>Could such a port be naturally compatible with all the existing host
>command environments (TSO, ISPEXEC, ISREDIT, MVS, LINKMVS, SYSCALL,
>SDSF, etc.), or would they need to be recoded entirely, or at least a
>lot of glue code written?

Such a port would run existing Rexx code in those environments. The
API might be different, requiring coding changes to, e.g., ISPF, SDSF,
TSO, but not to the Rexx code.
 
-- 
     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
     ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to